About Me

Austin, Texas, United States
I'm Caitlin, I'm 20, I attend UT as a neurobiology major and I'm a libertarian even though, according to the political ideology quiz I'm an enterpriser. I do support gay marriage and I'm not a supporter of the war in the Middle East. Other than that, enterpriser seemed to agree with me. Some of my political influences are Ayn Rand, Ron Paul, Gary Johnson, Debra Medina and Bob Barr. I voted in the 2008 presidential election for Bob Barr and plan on voted for Debra Medina in the 2010 Texas Gubernatorial primaries. I'm taking this class because it's required for all Texas graduates. I hope to hear other's opinions that are logical and well thought out. I love discussing politics, with any ideology, as long as it doesn't turn into a shouting match or accusation central. I got 86% on the civics quiz and got 6/12 on the current events quiz.

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Critique on an Opposing View of SB 1070

Link to classmates blog

"Amongst other things states don’t have the power to take immigration enforcement into their own hands. That’s the job of the federal government." I don't recall this type of immigration law being delegated as a federal right in the US Constitution. According to the 10th amendment, any rights not delegated to the federal government are reserved for the states, so, actually, Arizona does have the right to impose their own set of immigration laws. The first clause of the SB even states that, "NO OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A STATE MAY ADOPT A POLICY THAT LIMITS OR RESTRICTS THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS TO LESS THAN THE FULL EXTENT PERMITTED BY FEDERAL LAW." This is a common misconception and the federal government loves it. They want you to think they have a lot more power than they actually do. An example of this is the healthcare bill passed by president Obama. He mandated that by 2014 all Americans must have some form of healthcare or pay a fine. He has no authority to do this. Texas, among other states, sued the federal government for this unconstitutional law.
Another point of yours that didn't quite settle with me is that you seem to think that Arizona police officers are going to become Mexican hunters. This is not the case. Quoted from SB 1070, "FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON." Officers will not seek out brown people and demand to see proof of citizenship. The minute they did that to a high-powered Hispanic, the state of Arizona would see a multi-million dollar lawsuit. What the SB 1070 law allows for is requesting proof of citizenship when a crime, such as a robbery, has been committed or, when applying for a job. I wonder if you've even read the SB 1070 or just take what you hear about it for truth. Carrying around proof of citizenship doesn't seem a the nightmare you paint it out to be. I carry my drivers license on me all the times and never once has it bothered me or seemed inconvenient. Pulling out a piece of paper every once and awhile seems like a small price to pay to reduce the number of illegal immigrants. Millions of American tax dollars are going towards putting illegal immigrants through school. I don't see why, if someone want to be in America so badly, that they wouldn't fill out the application and pay the fees. What if they can't afford the fees? I hope they're not moving to America to become a homeless bum, so, if they aren't, their going to have an income which means they can pay the fee and pay taxes. If people want to come to America, they need to do it the right way. Americans shouldn't have to pay for bleeding hearts. I've provided a link to SB 1070

No comments:

Post a Comment